| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cromag Site Admin

Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 140
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icdedppul Princess

Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 255 Location: Salt Lake City
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I vote for neither. Study them in their habitat. I can't see putting them under unnatural circumstances and confinement or killing them just because we haven't logged and dissected a new species. I'm a die hard animal lover no matter what!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frogman Space Cadet

Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I say kill it so we have gentic info to clone more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
briget Princess

Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 102 Location: Lapine, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's a lot more to learn if they stay alive. I love animals even wield ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
test badger A snake, a snake, a scary scary snake

Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 224 Location: the lab (SLC Utah)
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I vote for "555-SQUIShed". Bet there's some funky dead stuff out there already, ripe (really ripe!) for the picking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DarkMonkeyGirl Hybrid

Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 60 Location: OOtah
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LOL.... I say 1. Observe it in natural habitat for behavioral study. 2. take biological samples to observe it's DNA. If you must have a physical sample clone it (though it won't be the same since nature/nuture effects would be different). Erm...I don't know! This is a conundrum isn't it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|